Cactus, Inc. (WHD) Q1 2023 Earnings Call Transcript
Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Cactus Q1, 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded.
I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Alan Boyd, Director of Corporate Development and Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Alan.
Thank you, and good morning. We appreciate you joining us on today’s call. Our speakers will be Scott Bender, our Chief Executive Officer; and Stephen Tadlock, our Chief Financial Officer. Also joining us today are Joel Bender, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Steven Bender, Vice President of Operations; TS, CEO of FlexSteel; and Will Marsh, our General Counsel and Vice President of Administration.
Please note that any comments we make on today’s call regarding projections or expectations for future events are forward-looking statements covered by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control.
These risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. We advise listeners to review our earnings release and the risk factors discussed in our filings with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements we make today are only as of today’s date, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statements.
In addition, during today’s call we will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our earnings release.
With that, I’ll turn the call over to Scott.
Thanks, Alan, and good morning to everyone. Before we commence our comments regarding the quarter, I want to take this opportunity to acknowledge some changes to our management team. Alan Boyd, who provided the introduction this morning, has joined us from Halliburton as Director of Corporate Development and Investor Relations. Alan has an extensive background ranging from investment banking to working as a drilling engineer at ExxonMobil.
He will be taking it over from John who is moving over to serve as CFO of FlexSteel. On behalf of our entire team, I’d like to thank John for his efforts, leading our Investor Relations function as we matured as a public company, and look forward to his continued success in a new role.
The past few months have been incredibly active here at Cactus. We announced and closed the FlexSteel acquisition during the quarter, and our reported results for the quarter include one month of contribution from FlexSteel’s business.
On a stand-alone basis, Cactus would have once again set records for both quarterly revenue and adjusted EBITDA as U.S. wellhead market share hit an all-time high. Consistent with the past, we’ll walk through Cactus results in detail, discussing product, rental and field service.
On a go-forward basis, we will report legacy Cactus as the Pressure Control segment and FlexSteel as a Spoolable Technologies segment and our guidance will reflect how we intend to report results in the future. Note that we will continue to evaluate the reporting structure particularly around corporate SG&A.
Some highlights for the first quarter include, revenue of $228 million, adjusted EBITDA of $79 million, adjusted EBITDA margins were nearly 35%, wellhead market share was a record 43% and we paid a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share.
I’ll now turn the call over to Steve Tadlock, our CFO, who will review our financial results. Following his remarks, I’ll provide some thoughts on our outlook for the near term before opening the lines for Q&A. Steve.
Thank you. As Scott mentioned, total Q1 revenues were $228 million, which includes one month of FlexSteel results. Pressure Control product revenues of $130 million were up 4% sequentially, driven primarily by an increase in rigs followed.
Gross margins, inclusive of depreciation expense were 40%. This was down 40 basis points sequentially due in part to product mix. In our Pressure Control product business, U.S. wellhead market share increased to 43.3% during the period. Despite the overall decline in the U.S. land rig count, our rigs followed rose by approximately 6%. This increase was driven by our larger publicly traded customers.
Our rigs followed with private operators remained relatively flat versus the fourth quarter. Pressure Control rental revenues were $27 million in Q1, down 2% versus the fourth quarter. The slight decline was driven by lower revenue from our Australian operations, which had a particularly strong fourth quarter. Gross margins were down 200 basis points to 42% due to higher redeployment-related costs.
Pressure Control field service and other revenues in Q1 were approximately $38 million, up 6% sequentially. This represented approximately 24% of combined Pressure Control product and rental-related revenues during the quarter, slightly above expectations.
Gross margins, inclusive of depreciation expense were 23%, down 80 basis points sequentially due to increased labor costs as retention remains a key focus. Pressure Control SG&A expenses were $22.7 million during the quarter, relatively flat sequentially despite higher transaction related fees and expenses, which totaled $8.6 million in Q1.
Excluding these transaction-related expenses, Pressure Control SG&A was approximately $14 million, representing approximately 7% of Pressure Control revenue. Pressure Control adjusted EBITDA was $69 million, an increase of $2.7 million sequentially.
As a reminder, we closed the FlexSteel acquisition on February 28, so the first quarter results include approximately one month ownership of the business. Given FlexSteel’s completion orientation, activity is often seasonally lower in Q1 and to a lesser extent in Q4. March had a strong finish to Q1 with $34 million of revenue.
Operating income in our Spoolable Technologies segment during the period was $0.2 million, inclusive of SG&A related expenses at FlexSteel. Operating income is also burdened by non-cash charges of $4.2 million associated with purchase price adjustments to acquired inventory. Additionally, operating income included $3.7 million of intangible asset amortization costs during the period.
Spoolable Technologies adjusted EBITDA, which backs out these noncash charges, as well as stock-based compensation expense, was $10.3 million during the month, which equates to an adjusted segment EBITDA margin of 30.5%.
On a total company basis, first quarter adjusted EBITDA was $79 million, up 20% from $66 million during the fourth quarter. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter at nearly 35% of revenues was similar to the fourth quarter.
Adjustments to total company EBITDA during the first quarter of 2023 included approximately [inaudible] compensation, $9 million in transaction related fees and expenses and $4 million related to the aforementioned non-cash purchase accounting related step up in inventory that increased Spoolable Technologies cost of goods sold during the period. We also backed out a $3.4 million gain from the revaluation of the TRA liability.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the first quarter was $13 million, which again includes $4 million of amortization expense related to intangible assets booked as part of purchase accounting. Total depreciation and amortization expense during the second quarter is expected to be approximately $22 million, $9 million of which is associated with our Pressure Control segment and $13 million associated with Spoolable Technologies.
This figure is inclusive of an expected $9 million of intangible amortization expense within Spoolable Technologies during the quarter. Intangible amortization expense is expected to decline thereafter, with the total amount estimated for the second half of 2023 at approximately $8 million or $4 million per quarter.
Net interest income during the first quarter was approximately $1 million. We expect interest expense of less than $3 million during the second quarter. Income tax expense during the first quarter was $2 million. Tax expense was reduced due to a benefit related to a release of our valuation allowance.
During the first quarter, the public or Class A ownership of the company averaged 81% and ended the quarter at 81%. Barring further changes in our public ownership percentage, we expect an effective tax rate of approximately 20% for Q2, 2023.
GAAP net income was $52 million in Q1, 2023 versus $41 million during the fourth quarter of 2022. The increase was driven by lower income tax expense and higher other income related to the non-cash revaluation of our TRA liability. We prefer to look at adjusted net income and earnings per share, which were $51 million and $0.64 per share, respectively during the first quarter versus $44 million and $0.57 per share in Q4, 2022.
Adjusted net income for the first quarter applied a 24.5% tax rate to our adjusted pretax income generated during the quarter. We estimate that the tax rate for adjusted EPS will be 24.5% during the second quarter of 2023.
During the first quarter, we paid a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share, resulting in a cash outflow of approximately $9 million, including related distributions to members. The Board has also approved a dividend of $0.11 per share to be paid in June. We ended the quarter with a cash balance of $75 million and gross bank debt of $155 million. Since the end of the quarter, we have paid off $60 million of the term loan balance, and the business continues to generate strong free cash flow.
Net CapEx was approximately $14 million during the first quarter of 2023. This included the purchase of a previously leased domestic property for approximately $7 million during the period. The CapEx outlook for the Pressure Control business remains unchanged for 2023. With the addition of the FlexSteel business, we have revised our full year capital expenditure budget to $45 million to $55 million.
That covers the financial review. And I’ll now turn the call over to Scott.
Thanks, Steve. I’ll now touch on our expectations for the second quarter based on our new reporting segments.
During the second quarter, we expect Pressure Control revenue to be down in the low single digits percentage wise versus the $195 million reported in the first quarter as softness in rig activity may well extend to regions beyond the gas weighted basins. We expect, however more resiliency in production sales during the period relative to wellhead equipment.
Additionally, we expect to gain some market share in our frac rental business, which should partially offset overall industry activity declines. Customer indications point to Cactus’ onshore rig activity down 3% to 5% sequentially on average in the second quarter, depending on the timing of rig releases. From Q1 exit to Q2 exit, we’re expecting an 8% to 10% drop in our rig count.
Note that we are not planning to officially publish market share on a go-forward basis, given that our new reporting structure will combine the legacy Cactus business lines into one segment. During the second quarter, we expect to make additional product shipments into Europe following an award in the region. This highlights the traction we continue to gain in various international locations.
Regarding our pant expansion efforts in the Mideast, we continue to work and evaluate ownership structures in the region, testing and trials remain the goal for 2023 with approvals to follow. Adjusted EBITDA margins in our Pressure Control segment are expected to be 33% to 35% for the second quarter, inclusive of Pressure Control’s SG&A and general corporate expenses.
This adjusted EBITDA guidance excludes $3.5 million of stock-based comp expense within the segment as well as transaction-related fees and expenses. Total depreciation expense for our Pressure Control segment during the second quarter is expected to be approximately $9 million.
Switching over to our Spoolable Technologies segment. We expect revenue of $100 million to $105 million during the second quarter, an increase of approximately 15% to 20% versus the first full quarter total, including the two months prior to the acquisition close. This highlights the benefits of the product diversification achieved with the acquisition.
Customer demand for FlexSteel’s unique technologies remains robust as FlexSteel continues to replace stick [ph] steel pipe and competing products. As previously disclosed, our Spoolable Technologies segment was working through some higher cost inventory during the first quarter, with the majority of this headwind behind us, we expect adjusted EBITDA margins on the segment to increase to between 32% and 33% for Q2.
Note that this margin guidance excludes the non-cash impact from the step-up and the value of inventory on hand associated with purchase accounting, which is anticipated to be approximately $13 million in Q2 and $2 million for the second half of 2023. We expect stock-based comp in our Spoolable Technologies segment to be approximately $1.3 million.
During the last month, we’ve had the opportunity to introduce FlexSteel’s Spoolable Technologies to select legacy Cactus customers, and we’ve already had success. I’m confident that this trend will continue as we further showcase the superior technology to additional clients. As with Cactus, there is potential to add more large accounts that can move the needle on a go-forward basis.
Looking forward, we’re excited about the opportunity set for the combined business. The capital wide structure, strong margin profile should enable the company to generate continued free cash flow this year and rapidly pay down debt. We hope to return to a net cash position this year which will enable the management team to further evaluate return of capital strategies.
With the recent pullback in commodity prices, while the recent pullback in commodity prices is expected to pressure domestic land activity, we expect our business to outperform general domestic industry activity. Customer balance sheets remain in much better shape today than they have in years past.
Cactus remains well positioned to deliver for our shareholders amid the current market environment. Finally, I want to personally thank our Management Team and Advisers for their herculean efforts in transitioning FlexSteel to a Cactus company.
And with that, I’ll turn it back over to the operator, so we may begin Q&A. Operator.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question will come from Dave Anderson with Barclays. Go ahead Dave.
Hi. Thank you very much. Good morning Scott, how are you?
Hey David. How are you?
I’m doing great. You just said, the rig count weakness you think is extending beyond the gas basin. I was wondering if you could expand on that a little bit more. Is that really a reflection of the lower oil prices on the private, is that what you’re seeing? We haven’t really heard the larger E&P or majors pulling back at all.
I was just wondering if you could kind of talk about how you see those customer bases shifting in the second quarter, and also maybe kind of what’s your sense on the back half of the year? Do you think its second quarter kind of plateau or I don’t know. Obviously gas is sort of its own thing, but maybe just kind of your broader thoughts on the market for the rest of the year if you wouldn’t mind.
Dave, you always ask such easy questions. So, let me say that it just stands to reason that with lower gas prices, that translates into lower cash flow for our customers and because our customers are so focused on returns to their shareholders, I can’t help but think, although I don’t have any objective evidence, that the pullback will extend beyond private. So to be sure, I think the privates will be affected as you all know, more than the public. But I don’t think the public are going to be totally immune from the pullback.
I think in addition to that, we have to recognize that oil is at $70, $72, I didn’t actually look this morning, but the low 70’s, and that has got to have probably an outsized impact on private, but to some extent on public as well. I also think though, that when OPEC has another opportunity to evaluate their production cuts, you’ll see production cuts that are going to be supportive of tightening supply.
Looking, I think that the rig count could possibly bottom out towards the end of the second quarter. And I think that the bottom could be in the range of 650 to 675, although David, I don’t have any objective evidence other than having been in this business for so long. I would – I think you know that sentiment is not exactly right now very supportive, but I don’t think it’s going to fall below that. And that’s – you know it’s not a terrible area. We could certainly enjoy very good returns at that level. But I think that everybody is sort of kidding themselves if they think that we’re only going to see another 30 rigs pullback.
Some wisdom I think for the markets, very well needed here. If I could shift over to your FlexSteel acquisition here, can you just talk a little bit about the overlap today with your wellhead business in FlexSteel? In other words, could you give me maybe a sense – I’m not asking for a number, but just a lot of wellheads today currently kind of then go into FlexSteel or is that – obviously, that’s going to be one of the opportunities.
I would think the selling point would be on reducing installation time for customers. But is there much of an overlap today, and can you just talk about kind of how you see that moving forward in terms of – is that the same – are you talking to the same person with the customer. Obviously it’s an E&P, but are you talking to the same people? How does that kind of work? Not really a business we’ve had a lot of exposure to historically.
Okay, so Dave, the first point I want to make is that everybody who buys at Cactus production tree, ultimately has to buy a FlexSteel product or stick pipe or a product competitive with FlexSteel like from NOV or from Shawcor or from Baker. So everybody’s got to run some sort of transmission line from the end of [inaudible].
In terms of Cactus customers, if we look at FlexSteel’s major customers in the U.S., they are also Cactus customers. So having said that, Cactus has about 5x the number of customers as FlexSteel. So we’re taking this opportunity to introduce the FlexSteel product line to those customers knowing that they’ve got to buy something, and so it’s logical we think to expand our wallet size for those customers. Does that help you at all?
That helps a ton. Kind of if I could just squeeze in one more question. I guess I don’t know a ton about how the interworking’s of FlexSteel, but how does pricing typically work here? Are steel prices kind of a driver like it is in OCTG? Just kind of loosely, but just how do the conversations come about? What are sort of the drivers of pricing?
TS is with us. I’m going to let TS offer his comments. .
So in terms of pricing, you know pricing is set with the intention of providing the best value to the customer. We sell our products, the FlexSteel products primarily on safety and quality, and in that regard we are very similar to Cactus and the legacy Cactus business. And that’s why we have also a similar sort of overlap in customer base amongst large customers as well as in privates. Although like Scott said, we have lots of opportunities to get introduced to legacy Cactus customers to grow our top line.
So David, let me just expand upon that. To be fair, TS is by nature sort of a modest person, but steel prices, clearly steel is a large component of this input. But the way they’ve marketed their product has been without an eye towards steel prices. So that means that when steel prices went crazy, beginning of course with the war in Ukraine, FlexSteel did not respond with commensurate increases in their product prices. So they don’t base their selling price on their cost of steel.
Okay, thank you very much. I appreciate it.
Thank you, David.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Kurt Hallead with Benchmark.
Hey! Good morning everybody.
Good morning Kurt. How are you?
Doing well, doing well. Thank you so much. Great! I appreciate all the outlook and the commentary and providing perspective around how you think things are going to evolve. I think everybody’s kind of grappled around elements of the business right now, so it’s all incrementally helpful.
So I guess, you know my question is, it sounds like you got a lot of momentum and a lot of runway here to kind of hold FlexSteel into what you’ve been doing, obviously with 5x the customer base. I know you also looked at the opportunity to leverage FlexSteel on the international front and understanding that’s still probably maybe a year away to seeing some real significant uptick. But just kind of curious you know. Scott, as you see that unfolding, what are some of the hurdles you may have to overcome to kind of see that international business grow to the extent you think it can?
You’re talking about hurdles in both product lines or…
Well, yes, yes. Just maybe overall again. I know this is not your first foray. You’re building an international business, right. But I just wanted to try to get a sense as to what you see happening in the pipeline, the kind of feedback you might be getting from customers right now and the kind of reception and how does that make you feel and do you think there’s going to be any roadblocks to expanding your business internationally?
You know I think the major roadblock remains those countries that require indigenous manufacturing and I think by now you know which countries those are. The rest of the world doesn’t have such requirements. And frankly, I think that while FlexSteel has historically done a much better job internationally than Cactus has, FlexSteel’s attention turned towards the domestic market as they try to adjust. They had a similar commitment as we had during the supply chain challenges, and that is their commitment to take care of their domestic U.S. customers. And when you do that, it’s just logical. It may not be appropriate, but it’s logical that you back off in terms of your focus on international markets.
For FlexSteel in particular, projects, international projects can be more disruptive to their manufacturing process than for Cactus and so as a result, they really couldn’t chase the big international projects to the same extent. Capital for us fortunately is not an issue and so we are combining our marketing efforts, FlexSteel and Cactus together to take that sort of approach to the international market. So we’ll be calling on customers with a single individual in many of the markets in hopes of getting some interest.
To be fair, purchasers on the FlexSteel side are mostly facility engineers, whereas on our side they are mostly drilling and completion engineers. So even though same companies, different set of decision makers.
So the major roadblocks right now have just been a lack of exposure. And so ask me this question in a year, as we begin to ramp up our efforts internationally. There’s no reason. Historically yes, international, you’ve had years where international was 30% plus of your business. There is no structural reason why we can’t return to that.
Yes, and I’d say – just to add to that I’d say, any kind of growth that we’re going to expect in international markets, especially in the offshore segment, will be a really big benefit for FlexSteel, because FlexSteel has got those asymmetric upside notes to grow in the shallow water offshore segments.
Yeah, thank you. I appreciate it. That’s it for me.
[Operator Instructions] Thank you everybody for your participation. I would now like to turn it back over to Alan Boyd for closing remarks.
We appreciate everyone’s interest in Cactus and look forward to speaking with you in the next quarter’s earnings call.
Thank you for your participation in today’s conference call. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect.